Fellow (ehemalig)

Prof. Sanjay G. Reddy

Associate Professor of Economics, The New School for Social Research in New York, USA

Research Project title: Cooperation: Rational vs. Social

Research abstract
Is cooperation rational? On one account, which is the dominant one in the social sciences and in decision theory – based on „rational choice“ based analyses of cooperation – cooperation is seen as being frequently irrational, even when all parties acting cooperatively would benefit each of them. This is because in some situations (for instance, the famous prisoner’s dilemma) acting cooperatively seems to require acting against one’s own interest, conceived in terms of concepts such as the „dominant strategy“.   The „rational“ justification for acting cooperatively in such situations has generally, in this tradition, been based upon the idea that players faced with the same situation repeatedly would weigh the benefits of deviating from cooperation in the short term against the losses in the long term from other parties withdrawing their cooperation as a result. Cooperation sustained on the basis of such a calculation has been referred to in game theory as „trusting“ behavior, but this seems a misnomer, since it appears to be merely „an encapsulation of self-interest“. As such, it cannot explain the decision to cooperate in a situation such as the (one shot) prisoner’s dilemma, in which standard rational choice theory would insist that cooperation is contrary to self-interest.  What, then, is trust, and what role does it have to play in cooperation? Can it also provide explanatory resources that go beyond the traditionally conceived  forms of „rational choice“ theory? We might hypothesize that trust in the context of cooperation is defined by a reliance on a belief that others will act cooperatively (in a manner that may or may not be contingent upon one’s own actions). For cooperation to be underpinned by trust, then, is for the cooperating agents to possess a belief that others will cooperate, and for that belief to help to sustain their own acts of cooperation. Cooperation understood in this way is compatible with the game theoretic understanding of cooperation arising in repeated play on the basis of self-interest but is in no way dependent on that narrow idea. The question of how to explain cooperation (if it is thought to need explanation) is in this perspective displaced onto another question, which is that of how it is that trust comes to exist and to be warranted. The project develops and elaborates these ideas.


Research project title: The Predicament of Economics

Research abstract
During my stay I will investigate the ‘predicament of economics’, in particular the underlying sources of difficulties in establishing agreed upon and ‘law-like’ economic knowledge, and what implications this has for our understanding of the status of economic knowledge and of the role it can or should play in society.
The project thus straddles the methodology, the sociology and politics of social science to ask how and why it is that the discipline, looked to in order to provide answers to pressing questions of social explanation and of policy, often does not do so fails to do so in a manner that many could consider to be satisfactorily, and is instead y, seemingly characterized by permanent internal conflicts, and the reign of ideology, fads and fashions, and some notable predictive and explanatory failures. The project explores the forces and factors operating on the discipline to deflect or prevent it from better serving its social mission and explores the predicament of economists, asking whether certain debates can ever reasonably expected to be resolved or whether their continuation is a manifestation of politics in another form. If there is a way forward that might permit the discipline to become both more reason-bound and more faithful to society, what is it?

Events:
Lecture by Sanjay Reddy
The predicament of Economics (and the social sciences more generally)
Tuesday 23.07.2019, 2-4 pm/ 14:00-16:00 Uhr (Building „Normative Orders“, 5.01)

Masterclass (with Sanjay Reddy)
The predicament of Economics (and the social sciences more generally)
Monday 22.07.2019 – Wednesday 24.07.2019; each day a morning session from 10-12 am and an afternoon session from 2-4 pm.
Also individual sessions can be attended.

  • Biografische Angaben

    Sanjay G. Reddy is an Associate Professor of Economics at The New School for Social Research.  He has also previously taught at Columbia University, and been a visitor at diverse academic institutions in the US, Europe and India.  He has held fellowships  from the Center for Ethics, the Center for Population and Development Studies at Harvard University, the Center for Human Values at Princeton University, the Justitia Amplificata program of the Goethe University of Frankfurt and Free University of Berlin and the Advanced Research Collaborative of the City University of New York.
    Recently he was a member of the Independent High-level Team of Advisers to the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations on the longer-term positioning of the UN Development System (in the context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) and has served in various other functions in the United Nations..  He is one of the co-founders of the Global Consumption and Income Project. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University, an M.Phil. in social anthropology from the University of Cambridge, and an A.B.  in applied mathematics with physics from Harvard University.
    For more information see: http://www.sanjayreddy.com/about

  • Publikationen

    – Beyond Property or Beyond Piketty?, forthcoming in: British Journal of Sociology
    – „Population Health, Economics and Ethics in The Age of Covid-19, in: BMJ Global Health, Vol. 5, Issue 7.
    – What is an Explanation? Statistical Physics and Economics, in: European Physics Journal Special Topics, July 2020, Vol 229.

    – “Inequalities and Identities” (with Arjun Jayadev), in Deprivation, Inequality and Polarization (ed. I. Dasgupta and M. Mitra), 2019, Springer.
    – “Poverty Beyond Obscurantism” in Beck, V./Hahn, H./Lepenies, R. (Eds.): Dimensions of Poverty. Springer (forthcoming; 2019).
    – „The Middle Muddle: Conceptualizing and Measuring the Global Middle Class“ (with Arjun Jayadev and Rahul Lahoti) in Martin Guzman ed. Toward a Just Society: Joseph Stiglitz and Twenty-First Century Economics, Columbia University Press.
    – International Trade and Labour Standards: A Proposal for Linkage (with Christian Barry), 2008, New York: Columbia University Press.

Aktuelles aus dem Forschungszentrum

Veranstaltung
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Podiumsdiskussion, Vortrag

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

weitere Infos ›
Veranstaltung
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Podiumsdiskussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

weitere Infos ›
News
19.02.2026

Call for Applications – Postdoctoral Fellowships

Am Forschungszentrum Normative Ordnungen sind für das akademische Jahr 2026/2027 mehrere Postdoctoral Fellowships mit einer Laufzeit von 10 Monaten (Beginn: 1. Oktober 2026) ausgeschrieben. Bewerbungsschluss für alle Programme ist der 15. März 2026.

weitere Infos ›
Veranstaltung
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Kolloqium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

weitere Infos ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanistische Politik und der Niedergang der Vernunft in liberalen Demokratien

Ein letztes Mal im Wintersemester 2025/26 lud das Forschungszentrum zur Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt. Zur Krise der Demokratie“. Zum Abschluss hat der Philosoph Michael Rosen von der Harvard University sein Konzept der „satanic politics“ als eine Variante der politischen Deutung der Welt vorgestellt.

weitere Infos ›
News
09.02.2026

Zur Aktualität des Gewaltbegriffs anhand von Camus und Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt von der Universität St. Gallen hat im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Krise der Demokratie“ einen Vortrag über Demokratien und den Gewaltbegriff gehalten. Unter dem Titel „Demokratien verteidigen. Zur Aktualität des Gewaltbegriffs bei Camus und Derrida“ besprach die Philosophin Formen von Gewalt und Revolte und ordnete diese im Hinblick auf ein demokratisches Setting ein.

weitere Infos ›
Publikation
04.02.2026 | Zeitschriftenartikel

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027. 

weitere Infos ›
News
02.02.2026

Staatlicher Wettbewerb um Menschen – David Owen über civil geopolitics

Im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt – Zur Zukunft der Demokratie“ präsentierte David Owen von der Universität Southampton sein Konzept der civil geopolitics.

weitere Infos ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel über Neuorientierungen in katastrophischen Zeiten

Im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Krise der Demokratie“ sprach die Soziologin über das Leben in und den Umgang mit katastrophischen Zeiten. Vor dem Hintergrund der Zerstörung der Lebensbedingungen, Kriegen, dauerhafter Krisenhaftigkeit sowie der Bedrohungen der Demokratie widmete sich Hentschel dem Einsickern des Katastrophischen in den gesellschaftlichen Alltag und einem sich verändernden aktivistischen und literarischen Umgang mit der Zukunft.

weitere Infos ›