Fellow (ehemalig)

Michael J. Christensen, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University (Ottawa, Canada)

Research project title:
Practices of Promoting Democratic Media: Paradoxes of Legitimacy and Institution Building in the Disinformation Era

Abstract
Is online disinformation an existential threat to global democracy? Is it a symptom of corporate media concentration, or is it just a new iteration of an ever-present feature of political communication? Whatever the answer, scholarly debates about ‘fake news’, disinformation and media manipulation have reached a fever pitch. Recent scholarship has focused on coordinated disinformation campaigns targeting the United States and the United Kingdom, partly in reaction to the 2016 Brexit referendum and the US Presidential election, but this research project argues that fake news is a smaller part of a much larger story. Since the Cold War era, Western democracies have waged global information campaigns extolling the virtues of free elections, free markets and free media. Governments in Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom eventually institutionalized these campaigns in the form of organizations promoting and assisting the development of democratic institutions around the world. Now these democracy promotion organizations are facing a crisis as networks of authoritarian governments, far-right political parties, internet trolls and social media personalities have leveraged popular social media platforms to undermine the legitimacy of democratic institutions. This research project looks at how formal democracy promotion organizations work to counter anti-democratic narratives by mobilizing international aid in the service of developing “independent media.” While attempting to bolster liberal narratives of free expression, this top-down approach to countering grassroots social media campaigns reveals the limitations of focusing on liberal norms grounded in the rule-of-law and institutional legitimacy in an media environment dominated by questions of personal credibility. Of course, democracy promotion organizations have, for decades, sidestepped questions about their own credibility by developing a form of expert knowledge about building legitimate institutions.
The research question guiding this project therefore asks: how do professionals in Western democracy organizations counter disinformation in practical terms? I view the project through a practice theory lens that assumes everyday organizational practices can provide unique explanations for complex social phenomena. This perspective builds on growing interest in practice theory in the fields of International Relations and Political Sociology, and I believe that these insights can greatly benefit current debates about disinformation and post-truth politics, which have primarily been taken up by communications scholars. While the specter of state-sponsored disinformation campaigns is a growing concern, there remains a dearth of literature exploring the relationship between disinformation, public discourse and democracy promotion. Developing a better understanding of disinformation is worthwhile in itself, but exploring this relationship also fills an important gap in our knowledge about the ways underlying norms of democratic discourse are being reimagined in the social media age.

  • Biografische Angaben

    Michael Christensen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University. He was previously a postdoctoral fellow at York University’s Global Digital Citizenship Lab and he held a research fellowship with the Democratic Resource Center at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington, DC. His academic interests are in the fields of democracy and human rights, international aid organizations, science and expert knowledge and digital media. His current research focuses on emerging forms of expertise and democratic debate mediated through digital technologies, with a special emphasis on the social, political and legal implications of disinformation.

  • Publikationen

    Christensen (2017) “Interpreting the Organizational Practices of North American Democracy Assistance” International Political Sociology, 11(2): 148-165.

    Christensen (2017) “A Critical Sociology of International Expertise: The Case of International Democracy Assistance,” in Kurasawa (ed.) Interrogating the Social – A Critical Sociology for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan

    Christensen (2015) “Re-establishing ‘the social’ in research on democratic processes: Mid-century voter studies and Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s alternative vision,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 51(3): 308-332

    Christensen (2013) “The Social Facts of Democracy: Science meets politics with Mosca, Pareto, Michels & Schumpeter,” Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(4): 460-486

Aktuelles aus dem Forschungszentrum

News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel über Neuorientierungen in katastrophischen Zeiten

Im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Krise der Demokratie“ sprach die Soziologin über das Leben in und den Umgang mit katastrophischen Zeiten. Vor dem Hintergrund der Zerstörung der Lebensbedingungen, Kriegen, dauerhafter Krisenhaftigkeit sowie der Bedrohungen der Demokratie widmete sich Hentschel dem Einsickern des Katastrophischen in den gesellschaftlichen Alltag und einem sich verändernden aktivistischen und literarischen Umgang mit der Zukunft.

weitere Infos ›
News
05.01.2026

Wir trauern um Thomas M. Schmidt

Mit Thomas M. Schmidt, der am letzten Tag des Jahres 2025 verstorben ist, in dem wir erst wenige Monate zuvor seinen 65. Geburtstag mit einem Symposium begingen, verlieren wir einen der großen Religionsphilosophen unserer Zeit. Sein jäher Tod reißt eine Lücke in die Gemeinschaft der Forschenden, die wie er zu verstehen suchen, was die Rolle der Religion in den säkularen Gesellschaften unserer Zeit ist und sein kann. Zugleich wird er als der wunderbare Mensch fehlen, der er war.

weitere Infos ›
Veranstaltung
29.01.2026 | Frankfurt

Civil Geopolitics and the Dilemmas of the Democratic State

Ringvorlesungen, Vortrag

Vortrag von David Owen (Universtiy of Southampton) im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung "Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Krise der Demokratie" im Wintersemester 2025/2026

weitere Infos ›
Publikation
19.12.2025 | Sammelband

Faszination und Freiheit 

Günther, Klaus; Zabel, Benno (Hrsg.) (2025): Faszination und Freiheit - Gegenwartsdiagnosen im Anschluss an Christoph Menkes Theorie der Befreiung, Weilerswist (Velbrück Wissenschaft).

weitere Infos ›
Publikation
12.12.2025 | Sammelband

Zwischen Transformation und Abolitionismus. Das Strafrecht und die Vielfalt der Alternativen

Tobias Singelnstein, Christoph Burchard (2025)

weitere Infos ›
Publikation
12.12.2025 | Buchkapitel

Was bleibt von der Verantwortung jenseits der Strafe übrig?

Günther, Klaus (2025): „Was bleibt von der Verantwortung jenseits der Strafe übrig?“. In: Zabel Benno; Singelnstein; Tobias und Burchard, Christoph (Hrsg.): Zwischen Transformation und Abolitionismus. Das Strafrecht und die Vielfalt der Alternativen. Velbrück Wissenschaft, S. 207-241.

weitere Infos ›
News
11.12.2025

Jonathan White über Zukunftsdenken in Demokratien

Zum zweiten Termin der Ringvorlesung "Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Krise der Demokratie". Der Politikwissenschaftler White diskutiert Sichtweisen auf die Zukunft in Demokratien. Ein Nachbericht

weitere Infos ›
News
04.12.2025

Die Krise der Demokratietheorie aus soziologischer Perspektive

Die Soziologin Jenny Brichzin hat mit ihrem Vortrag „Krise der Demokratietheorie? Eine soziologische Intervention“ unsere Ringvorlesung „Am Scheidepunkt? Zur Zukunft der Demokratietheorie“ eröffnet. Die Soziologin kritisiert, gesellschaftliches Zusammenleben werde in der Demokratietheorie bisher unzureichend thematisiert. Ein Nachbericht

weitere Infos ›
Publikation
03.12.2025 | Zeitschriftenartikel

The Archipelago Capitalism of Citizenship-By-Investment

Džankić, Jelena; Seyfettinoglu, Mira; Shachar, Ayelet; Vink, Maarten; Baaren, Luuk van der (2025): „The Archipelago Capitalism of Citizenship-By-Investment“. In: Comparative Political Studies, OnlineFirst.

weitere Infos ›