Former Fellow

Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez

Magistrada / Federal Judge at the Colombian Federal Administrative Court (Consejo de Estado, Colombia)

Research project:
The peace process and the democratic system in Colombia: The role of electoral justice in the post-conflict period

Abstract
The signing of the final agreement to end the conflict and build a stable and lasting peace between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrillas led to a change in the framework in which social conflicts develop in the country.
Democracy replaces the battlefields where armed violence prevailed in the past, re-establishing institutional channels to channel protests and social demands as a sine qua non for maintaining peaceful coexistence within any society.

This is no small achievement, as it puts an end to an armed conflict that not only lasted more than half a century, but also claimed more than 8,376,843 victims, all of whom are now demanding truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition. Thus, one of the cruelest phases of Colombian violence, that characteristic feature of republican history, but which has its origins in the arrival of the Spanish “conquistadors” in the territory in 1499, comes to an end.
The construction and consolidation of peace in Colombia is thus achieved by strengthening the democratic system as a substitute sphere for the violent conflict; the goal of “democratic opening to build peace” (as the second aspect of the Havana Agreement) promotes not only the quantitative expansion, but the fundamental qualification (deepening) of this democratic opening beyond elections, recognizing the quality of those who were outside the civil society sphere in the past as political subjects.

These two approaches – expansion and qualification – of the democratic principle are realized with the signing of the Peace Pact, on the one hand, by strengthening affirmative measures with a gender focus that lead to a certain political equality of the sexes and, on the other hand, by creating a normative framework that changes the status quo of the electoral regime by, among other things, reducing the costs of establishing political parties and movements, promoting the emergence of new electoral authorities and regulating the exercise of political opposition.

These changes to the Colombian electoral regime pose new challenges for the electoral jurisdiction, whose task in this new scenario will be to protect the “bulwark” of the agreement – namely the democratic principle. On the one hand, it must guarantee compliance with the commitments to a gender-equal democracy, and on the other, it must adapt to the new legal framework.

Democracy becomes the epicenter for the construction of a stable and lasting peace, and the role of the electoral judge must be precisely to maintain the minimum conditions for its implementation, so that in this peaceful context social demands can develop that have used war as a means of protest in the past. The function of the electoral jurisdiction is thus primarily to maintain the conditions for the exercise of democracy, as a basis for the development of a culture of political debate, as is characteristic of the transitional regime that established the signing of the agreement.

The electoral judge is the guarantor of the demands arising from the signing of the Havana Agreement and affecting the country’s democratic system, so that his jurisdiction will undoubtedly go beyond the judicial sphere and influence the political dynamic – its exercise and consolidation.

However, the preservation of democracy is not an exclusive task of this specialized jurisdiction, but rather extends to various judicial bodies in Colombia, in particular the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, which was created by the Havana Pact. Its task is to investigate and try crimes committed during the armed civil war, whereby a conviction does not exclude or restrict the political participation of those convicted.

The construction of the agreement is thus understood as the key to democracy – as a basic value framework to be upheld by the electoral judges, but equally by the emerging jurisdiction responsible for the transitional instruments.

Events:
Thursday, November 8, 2018, 6 p.m.
Public lecture: Dhe peace process and the democratic system in Colombia: The role of electoral justice in the post-conflict period

Friday, November 9, 2018, 1:45 p.m.
Lecture in the seminar “Contemporary Political Thought” at the American University of Paris
The Peace Process and Democratic System in Colombia: The Role of Electoral Jurisdiction in Post-Conflict Situations

Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 2 p.m.
Lecture at the Ibero-American Colloquium at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law
The peace process in Colombia. Progress and challenges from the perspective of the Council of State

  • Biografische Angaben

    Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez studied law at the Universidad La Gran Colombia (Bogotá) and specialized in criminal law and criminology at the Universidad Santo Tomás (Bogotá). Since 2013, she has been a federal judge in Colombia (Consejo de Estado), where she has presided over important trials such as the nullity action against the results of the referendum for peace in Colombia and currently the nullity action against the 2018-2022 elections to the Senate of the Republic. Before becoming a federal judge, she held various positions as a public prosecutor. She was also Vice President of the National Commission for Control and Electoral Matters of the Attorney General's Office and a judge at the National Electoral Council and the Council of State. She has taught at various universities such as the Universidad Libre de Colombia, the Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario and the Universidad Sergio Arboleda. She has also acted as a consultant on issues of electoral law, contractual and non-contractual liability of the state, disciplinary law and property liability of public officials. Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez is the author of numerous articles and research papers on various topics, including public defense, arbitration, electoral crimes, the electoral process and electoral control.
  • Publikationen

    /

News from the research center

Publication
12.05.2026 | Online article

Disinhibited Informalization: Talk Radio, Bro Podcasts and the Aesthetics of Populism

This essay by Johannes Völz is a revised and updated translation of “Enthemmte Informalisierung: Talk Radio, Bro-Podcasts und die Ästhetik des Populismus,” WestEnd: Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 22.2 (2025): 3–24. It is published here as part of the b2o Review’s “Stop the Right” dossier.

more information ›
Event
20.05.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Von der Selbstermächtigung zum sozialen Widerstand

Lecture

Vortrag von Prof. Dr. Axel Honneth (Frankfurt am Main / New York Columbia University) mit anschließender Diskussion im Rahmen des Rechtstheoretischen Mittwochsseminars von Klaus Günther, Dan Wielsch und Benno Zabel.

more information ›
Event
19.05.2026 | Frankfurt

Speculative Truth Regimes

Panel Discussion

Event with Adam Kahlil (New Red Order) and Toby Lee (NYU) as part of the Series Visual Truth Regimes, organized by Laliv Melamed (Goethe University Frankfurt, Normative Orders), Felix Trautmann (Institut für Sozialforschung; HBK Braunschweig) and Franziska Wildt (Institut für Sozialforschung).

more information ›
Event
25./26.06.2026 | Frankfurt

Shifting Regimes, Changing Orders

Conference

Conference as part of WDC2026 in collaboration with Deutsche Gesellschaft für Designtheorie und -forschung (DGTF), Kunstgewerbemuseum/Design Campus SKD and Design and Democracy

more information ›
Event
28./29.05.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Global Health Justice: Principles and Practice

Conference

Following the research focus of the Global Health Justice Postdoctoral Programme, funded by Höppsche Stiftung, the "Global Health Justice: Principles and Practice" conference places a particular emphasis on themes such as the human right to health, political activism and health justice issues, and problems of structural injustice and vulnerable populations in health care. Keynote lectures by Jonathan Wolff and Kanchana Mahadevan. The Global Health Justice Programme and this conference are supported by the Höppsche Stiftung in Villmar.

more information ›
Event
14.07.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Democracy Over Time and the Climate Crisis

Lecture Series

Vortrag von Anja Karnein (Binghamton). Die Vortragsreihe untersucht Fragen der Klimakrise als Herausforderungen für demokratische Gesellschaften und konzentriert sich auf Themen wie politische Legitimität, Widerstand gegen fossile Brennstoffe und die Interessen künftiger Generationen. Sie wird organisiert von Prof. Dr. Darrel Moellendorf und Dr. Lukas Sparenborg.

more information ›
Event
10.06.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Capital Investment, Inequality, and State Power in a Time of Climate Emergency

Lecture, Lecture Series

The lecture series examines questions of the climate crisis as challenges for democratic
societies and focuses on issues of political legitimacy, fossil fuel resistance, and the interests
of future generations.

more information ›
Event
23.06.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Wehrhafte Demokratie: Chancen und Grenzen des Parteiverbots

Panel Discussion

Im Mittelpunkt des Abends steht die Frage, ob und unter welchen verfassungsrechtlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Voraussetzungen ein Verbot einer demokratisch gewählten, rechtsnational ausgerichteten Partei als legitimes Mittel in Betracht gezogen werden kann oder nicht. Ausgehend von den normativen Grundlagen des Parteienverbots im Grundgesetz, möchten wir die hohen rechtlichen Hürden und demokratietheoretischen Spannungsfelder dieser Maßnahme erörtern – zwischen Pluralismus und Selbstverteidigung, zwischen Meinungsfreiheit und Schutz der freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung.

more information ›