Professorship of the Cluster of Excellence – Transnational Governance

Prof. Dr. Jens Steffek

The professorship for “Transnational Governance” lies at the interface between the traditional analysis of international relations, research on social actors operating across borders and normative questions of political theory, in particular democratic theory. These different strands of research are linked by the focus of the research area on questions of the legitimacy of governance beyond the nation state.

Legitimation as a social process and legitimacy as its result are phenomena that are characterized by the close interlinking of an empirical and a normative dimension, in the sense that in the concept of legitimacy the empirical validity of a political order is made dependent on normative considerations of correctness and appropriateness. Based on this core concept and an empirical-analytical as well as normative-theoretical interest in knowledge, we attempt to develop a new, critical perspective on the political handling of cross-border problems and conflicts.

The research activities can be roughly divided into three sub-areas: 1. legitimation narratives of international governance are examined, focusing on the justifications of international organizations as functional agencies that are not based on democratic participation and control. 2. the professorship examines the legitimation potentials of civil society participation, including in the context of the institutionalization of civil society participation in international organizations. And 3. the connection between the global order and the social question was examined in retrospect to the 20th century as well as with regard to current developments, such as in the context of the latest climate protection agreements.

Ad 1) The central thesis is that the advance of international organizations (both governmental and non-governmental) since the 19th century must be understood as part of the bureaucratization of political rule described by Weber and can therefore only be legitimized in rational-legal terms.

Ad 2) The central finding here is that the participation of non-state actors in the governance process can create a political public sphere to a limited extent, but hardly counteracts the basic trend towards a technocratization of transnational governance.

Ad 3) With regard to the possible end of redistributive multilateralism, it would appear that the shift in climate policy from legally secured to voluntary commitments, which began in Copenhagen and was reinforced in Paris in 2015, has also changed the concept of justice in global climate policy by invalidating the traditionally important justification of compensation for historical injustice.

The most important publications of this professorship of the Cluster of Excellence:

Holthaus, Leonie & Jens Steffek: “Experiments in International Administration. The Forgotten Functionalism of James Arthur Salter”, in: Review of International Studies 42(1), 2016, pp. 114-135.

McGee, Jeffrey & Jens Steffek: “The Copenhagen Turn in Global Climate Governance and the Contentious History of Differentiation in International Law”, in: Journal of Environmental Law Vol. 28(1), 2016, pp. 37-63.

Steffek, Jens: “Max Weber, Modernity and the Project of International Organization”, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, FirstView, DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2015.1020481, 2015.

Steffek, Jens. “The Cosmopolitanism of David Mitrany: Equality, Devolution, and Functional Democracy beyond the State”, International Relations 29(1), 2015, pp. 23-44.

Steffek, Jens: “Fascist Internationalism”, in: Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44(1), 2015, pp. 3-22.

News from the research center

Event
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Panel Discussion, Lecture

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

more information ›
Event
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Panel Discussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

more information ›
Event
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Colloquium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

more information ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanist politics and the decline of reason in liberal democracies

For the last time in the winter semester 2025/26, the Research Center hosted the lecture series "Am Scheidepunkt. On the crisis of democracy". At the end, philosopher Michael Rosen from Harvard University presented his concept of "satanic politics" as a variant of the political interpretation of the world.

more information ›
News
09.02.2026

On the topicality of the concept of violence based on Camus and Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt from the University of St. Gallen gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence as part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", she gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence. Under the title "Defending democracies. On the topicality of the concept of violence in Camus and Derrida", the philosopher discussed forms of violence and revolt and categorized them with regard to a democratic setting.

more information ›
Publication
04.02.2026 | Journal article

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027.

more information ›
News
02.02.2026

States competing for people - David Owen on civil geopolitics

As part of the lecture series "At the Crossroads - The Future of Democracy", David Owen from the University of Southampton presented his concept of civil geopolitics.

more information ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel on reorientation in catastrophic times

As part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", the sociologist spoke about living in and dealing with catastrophic times. Against the backdrop of the destruction of living conditions, wars, permanent crises and threats to democracy, Hentschel addressed the infiltration of the catastrophic into everyday social life and a changing activist and literary approach to the future.

more information ›
Publication
08.01.2026 | Journal article

Gender Differences in Financial Advice

Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Hackethal, Andreas; Koenen, Johannes; Laudenbach, Christine (2025): „Gender Differences in Financial Advice“. In: American Economic Review, 115 (12), pp. 4218–4252.

more information ›