Courts as forums for criticism

Dr. Tatjana Sheplyakova

Duration of the research project: 02/2018 – 04/2021

Judging something against a standard has been at the semantic core of criticism since antiquity. In this sense, the activity of the courts can be described as genuinely critical. However, it needs to be clarified whether this is a form of criticism that immunizes the legal system against change – a criticism without “effect” (Nietzsche), whose function is to maintain and stabilize the system. Or whether the courts, and if so, under what conditions, can be understood as places of criticism that has an emancipatory effect and releases social change through progress in the law.

The first step is to discuss this question against the background of the skepticism towards the courts that is widespread in radical democratic and sovereignty-centered approaches in political philosophy and theory. The second step is to follow Hegel’s remarks on the administration of justice: In the basic lines of his Philosophy of Right (1821, §§ 209-229), Hegel gives space to the idea that the judicial process is not, at least not only to be thought of as redressing the violation of rights by affirming the norm. Rather, it opens up a space in which the injustice of “bourgeois society” itself can be made cognitively accessible, i.e. basically a space for reflection on the natural character of its laws. This connection needs to be explained in more detail. In a third step, the aim is to outline a critical typology of grievances and to identify criteria that make it possible to distinguish emancipatory from purely privatizing or politically motivated grievances.

Selected publications on the project:

Sheplyakova, Tatjana (2018): Klagen als Ausübung der “Gegenrechte”, in: Andreas Fischer-Lescano/Hannah Franzki/Johan Horst (eds.), Gegenrechte. Rechte jenseits des Subjekts, Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen, pp. 205-226.
Sheplyakova, Tatjana (2016):Das Klagerecht oder Individuen als Rechtserzeuger, in: Sabrina Zucca-Soest (ed.), Akteure im Recht, Nomos: Baden-Baden, pp. 31-46.
Sheplyakova, Tatjana (2016): Das Recht der Klage aus demokratietheoretischer Perspektive, in: German Journal of Philosophy 64 (1), pp. 45-67.

News from the research center

Event
19.06.2026 | Frankfurt

„Dass niemand wirklich frei ist, bevor es nicht alle sind.“

Symposium

International Symposium in Memory of Jürgen Habermas. Featuring international panels on the rise of authoritarianism and the threats to democracy as well as on the communicative turn in philosophy and sociology, followed by a keynote from by Axel Honneth.

more information ›
Event
23.06.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

AI Truth Regimes

Panel Discussion

Artificial intelligence is currently transforming the way knowledge and truth are produced and understood. With the advent of AI, people are progressively transitioning from being active subjects and producers of epistemic processes to becoming their mere objects. The of this discussion will be critical engagements towards these developments as well as opportunities for resistance. With Antonio Somaini, Júlia Nueno Guitart (Forensic Architecture) and Medico International.

more information ›
Event
23./24.06.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

The Legacy of Kant’s Political Philosophy

Workshop

A two-day workshop on Howard Williams‘ new book about Immanuel Kant‘s political philosophy.

more information ›
Event
22.06.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Rechtsextremismus und Polizei - Erscheinungsformen, Umgangsweisen, Perspektiven

Panel Discussion

Die Diskussion knüpft an den Sammelband „Rechtsextremismus als Herausforderung für Polizei und Gesellschaft“ an, der aktuelle Perspektiven aus Wissenschaft, Praxis und Zivilgesellschaft zusammenführt.

more information ›
News
18.05.2026

Videopodcast-Reihe „Our Planet, Our Health“ gestartet

Mit „Our Planet, Our Health“ startet eine neue Videopodcast-Reihe zu Fragen globaler Gesundheitsgerechtigkeit. Die Reihe, gehostet von Dr. Romina Rekers, ist eine Initiative des Global Health Justice Postdoctoral Programme (GHJ), gefördert von der Höppschen Stiftung.

more information ›
Publication
12.05.2026 | Online article

Disinhibited Informalization: Talk Radio, Bro Podcasts and the Aesthetics of Populism

This essay by Johannes Völz is a revised and updated translation of “Enthemmte Informalisierung: Talk Radio, Bro-Podcasts und die Ästhetik des Populismus,” WestEnd: Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 22.2 (2025): 3–24. It is published here as part of the b2o Review’s “Stop the Right” dossier.

more information ›
Event
25./26.06.2026 | Frankfurt

Shifting Regimes, Changing Orders

Conference

Conference as part of WDC 2026 in collaboration with Deutsche Gesellschaft für Designtheorie und -forschung (DGTF), Kunstgewerbemuseum/Design Campus SKD and Design and Democracy

more information ›
Publication
22.04.2026 | Chapter

Körpergeschlecht und Selbstbestimmung

Britz, Gabriele (2026): "Körpergeschlecht und Selbstbestimmung". In. Mangold, Anna Katharina; Völzmann, Berit (Hrsg.): Gerechtigkeit als Thema der Rechtswissenschaft, Nomos, S. 41-48.

more information ›