The emergence of national legal systems in post-Ottoman Southeast Europe

Project leader: Prof. em. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Michael Stolleis

The project was dedicated to the formation of national legal systems in the Southeast European states in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It is a complex process whose structural conditions reach far back into the preceding Ottoman period.

What is the role of Western law and the patterns of Occidental modernity in post-Ottoman Southeast Europe? What are the conditions of legal transfers and how is the new law implemented and legitimized? What about the constraints of national restarts and how present is the Ottoman legacy in the post-Ottoman normative order? With the decline of the Ottoman Empire, the historical region of Southeast Europe is entering a phase of forced change. The post-Ottoman constellation is a mixture of old and new law, of traditional, transformed and transferred normativity and the evidence of sub-regional specifics. At the same time, it is embedded in processes of the formation of nation states and the quest for their legitimization. The topics of constitution-making and the development of modernized criminal and civil law were examined. Particular attention was paid to researching judicial and non-judicial enforcement of norms.

The project views the legal history of the region both in a pan-European context and within the framework of Ottoman history. In the course of a forced modernization of the traditionally organized societies of Southeast Europe, law was seen as both an end and a goal. The new nation states attempted to replace their own legal traditions, which were dominated by customary law, informal dispute resolution or, in some cases, feudal jurisdiction, with modern, Western European law – combined with the idea that this would also help them achieve the level of development of Western European states. Modernization and the transfer of law were therefore the focus of the project and were examined as examples in the areas of constitutional law, civil law and criminal law. The project set up research groups in Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and Turkey, each consisting of six to eight academics. In cooperation with the University of Vienna (Prof. Dr. Thomas Simon), a further group was set up with Bosnian and Serbian academics.

The results were discussed in a series of cross-group workshops and have been published in two project volumes in the MPIeR’s “Studies in European Legal History” series:
Michael Stolleis (ed., with the collaboration of Gerd Bender and Jani Kirov) (2016): Conflict and Coexistence. Die Rechtsordnungen Südosteuropas im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, Vol. 1: Rumänien, Bulgarien, Griechenland, Frankfurt/M.: Klostermann, 2 half-volumes, XIV, X, 1031 p.
Simon, Thomas (ed.) (2017): Konflikt und Koexistenz Die Rechtsordnungen Südosteuropas im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, vol. 2: Serbien, Bosnien-Herzegowina, Albanien, Frankfurt/M.: Klostermann. IX, 629 PP.

The most important publications also include:
Gerd Bender/Jani Kirov (2010): “Die Entstehung nationaler Rechtssysteme im postosmanischen Südosteuropa: Dekonstruktion, Formation und Transfer von Normativität”, in: Jahrbuch der MPG 2010, (online at: http://www.mpg.de/387915/forschungsSchwerpunkt).
Jani Kirov (2009): “Foreign Law Between Grand Hazard and Great Irritation: The Bulgarian Experience after 1878”, in: Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2, 699-722.
Jani Kirov (2011): “Prolegomena zu einer Rechtsgeschichte Südosteuropas”, in: Rechtsgeschichte 18, 140-161. Michael Stolleis (2012): “Transfer normativer Ordnungen, Baumaterial für junge Nationalstaaten”, in: Rechtsgeschichte 20, 72-84.

The project included the international conference “Zur Entstehung nationaler Rechtssysteme im postosmanischen Südosteuropa. Deconstruction, Formation and Transfer of Normativity”, 29-30.9.2010.

News from the research center

Event
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Panel Discussion, Lecture

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

more information ›
Event
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Panel Discussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

more information ›
Event
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Colloquium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

more information ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanist politics and the decline of reason in liberal democracies

For the last time in the winter semester 2025/26, the Research Center hosted the lecture series "Am Scheidepunkt. On the crisis of democracy". At the end, philosopher Michael Rosen from Harvard University presented his concept of "satanic politics" as a variant of the political interpretation of the world.

more information ›
News
09.02.2026

On the topicality of the concept of violence based on Camus and Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt from the University of St. Gallen gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence as part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", she gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence. Under the title "Defending democracies. On the topicality of the concept of violence in Camus and Derrida", the philosopher discussed forms of violence and revolt and categorized them with regard to a democratic setting.

more information ›
Publication
04.02.2026 | Journal article

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027.

more information ›
News
02.02.2026

States competing for people - David Owen on civil geopolitics

As part of the lecture series "At the Crossroads - The Future of Democracy", David Owen from the University of Southampton presented his concept of civil geopolitics.

more information ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel on reorientation in catastrophic times

As part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", the sociologist spoke about living in and dealing with catastrophic times. Against the backdrop of the destruction of living conditions, wars, permanent crises and threats to democracy, Hentschel addressed the infiltration of the catastrophic into everyday social life and a changing activist and literary approach to the future.

more information ›
Publication
08.01.2026 | Journal article

Gender Differences in Financial Advice

Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Hackethal, Andreas; Koenen, Johannes; Laudenbach, Christine (2025): „Gender Differences in Financial Advice“. In: American Economic Review, 115 (12), pp. 4218–4252.

more information ›