Formation of a new gender order in Tunisia after the revolution

Project management: Prof. Dr. Susanne Schröter

The newly negotiated gender order in post-revolutionary Tunisia was addressed in the research, which was embedded in the focus area “Post/secularism”. Ms. Zayed worked with female parliamentarians from the Islamist Ennahdha party in the National Constituent Assembly and observed decision-making processes. After a long political struggle and dispute, the transformation phase ends with the adoption of the “new” Tunisian constitution of the “second” republic on 26.01.2014.
The Tunisian gender order is defined by traditional customs, religion and seemingly unshakeable hierarchies. In this respect, patriarchal elites are resisting the social change that young people are seeking and demanding. This was the credo of the Tunisian revolution. However, it is an issue that is closely interwoven with questions of law, economics and social policy.
The interviews depicted the current state of affairs with regard to the gender order in Tunisian society. The positioning of the researcher played a central role in this. As a woman wearing a headscarf, Ms. Zayed gained the spontaneous trust of her female counterparts in the Islamist Ennahdha party, who would by no means have given a male researcher comparable open information. As a self-confessed Muslim woman, she also earned the respect of men who did not refuse to answer her questions. However, this access also showed her the limits of her work. The secular-oriented women’s rights activists of the “Association des Femmes Démocrates” refused to answer her scientific questions because they saw the headscarf as a “political symbol”. For this reason, she changed her initially very broad research question and concentrated on the women’s wing of Tunisia’s most prominent Islamist party.
The research shows a rigid understanding of Islam on the part of the women involved and the persistence of traditional role models. It is women who justify the mechanisms of oppression and enforce them on young people. The patriarchal family is regarded as the nucleus of Tunisian society, and the father’s word of power is considered unquestionable by Islamists. Premarital sex among women is a punishable offense, while for men it is seen solely as a peccadillo. The cult of virginity is becoming increasingly grotesque and promotes nothing other than the equally frowned upon anal intercourse of unmarried women as well as medical businesses in Tunisia that produce and insert artificial hymens. Homosexuals have to hide and are prosecuted. Divorced women are stigmatized and branded as difficult to place. In addition, sexual violence is on the rise and is rarely reported because the police almost always blame the victim.
In summary, it can be said that the double standards outlined above pose a serious problem for women. Individual rights that protect women must continue to be enforced in the future, especially against orthodox Muslims and the powerful Salafists.

The project is currently in the phase of writing up the results. The aim is to submit the dissertation at the end of 2017.

Early interim results were published as:

Schröter, Susanne and Sonia Zayed: “Tunisia: From State Feminism to Revolutionary Islamism”, in: S. Schröter (ed.): Gender justice through democratization? Transformations and restorations of gender relations in the Islamic world Bielefeld: Transcript, 2013, pp. 17-44.

people in this project:

Project management / contact person

Schröter, Susanne, Prof. Dr.

Project staff

Hensler, Jonas

Khatib, Hakim

Lang, Sabine, Dr.

Zayed, Sonja

News from the research center

Event
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Panel Discussion, Lecture

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

more information ›
Event
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Panel Discussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

more information ›
Event
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Colloquium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

more information ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanist politics and the decline of reason in liberal democracies

For the last time in the winter semester 2025/26, the Research Center hosted the lecture series "Am Scheidepunkt. On the crisis of democracy". At the end, philosopher Michael Rosen from Harvard University presented his concept of "satanic politics" as a variant of the political interpretation of the world.

more information ›
News
09.02.2026

On the topicality of the concept of violence based on Camus and Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt from the University of St. Gallen gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence as part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", she gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence. Under the title "Defending democracies. On the topicality of the concept of violence in Camus and Derrida", the philosopher discussed forms of violence and revolt and categorized them with regard to a democratic setting.

more information ›
Publication
04.02.2026 | Journal article

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027.

more information ›
News
02.02.2026

States competing for people - David Owen on civil geopolitics

As part of the lecture series "At the Crossroads - The Future of Democracy", David Owen from the University of Southampton presented his concept of civil geopolitics.

more information ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel on reorientation in catastrophic times

As part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", the sociologist spoke about living in and dealing with catastrophic times. Against the backdrop of the destruction of living conditions, wars, permanent crises and threats to democracy, Hentschel addressed the infiltration of the catastrophic into everyday social life and a changing activist and literary approach to the future.

more information ›
Publication
08.01.2026 | Journal article

Gender Differences in Financial Advice

Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Hackethal, Andreas; Koenen, Johannes; Laudenbach, Christine (2025): „Gender Differences in Financial Advice“. In: American Economic Review, 115 (12), pp. 4218–4252.

more information ›