Constituting and changing forms of foreign policy

Project leaders: Prof. Dr. Andreas Fahrmeir, Prof. Dr. Gunther Hellmann and Dr. Miloš Vec

The project was based on a conceptual problem. The development of the understanding of “international politics” is closely linked to the establishment of what is commonly referred to in International Relations (IR) as the “Westphalian system of states”. However, if the historical consideration of “foreign policy” is related to the peculiarities of the Westphalian system, the history of foreign policy is reduced to the “early” and “late” modern period – i.e. to the era in which “states” can be identified without great difficulty and in which the modern vocabulary of describing foreign policy comes into use – a perspective that is both “presentist” and “Eurocentric”.

In contrast, the project was based on the hypothesis that a vocabulary for the description of foreign policy can be developed that focuses on the construction of a certain form of demarcation that can be observed in all epochs and that – regardless of the vocabulary used to describe them – can be treated as functional equivalents of foreign policy in the modern sense. Developing such a vocabulary was one of the aims of the project, which was carried out in cooperation between IB, history and legal history and which organized two international conferences (in Bologna in 2011 and in Frankfurt in 2012) for this purpose.

At the same time, three projects on the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries were used to more precisely determine continuities and caesuras between different forms of conceptualizing and shaping “foreign policy”, which focused on multiple boundaries between “inside” and “outside”: on the “old” empire, on the “European concert” and on the mandate system after the First World War.

The results were published in a conference volume edited by the PIs (Hellmann, Gunther/Fahrmeir, Andreas/Vec, Miloš (2016): The Transformation of Foreign Policy, Oxford University Press) and have been included in another edited volume (Hellmann, Gunther; Jacobi, Daniel; Stark Urrestarazu, Ursula (ed.) (2015): “Earlier, more decisive and more substantial”? The new debate on Germany’s foreign policy Wiesbaden: Springer-VS).

The most important publications in the research project also include:
Hellmann, Gunther (2017): “Linking Foreign Policy and Systemic Transformation in Global Politics: Methodized Inquiry in a Deweyan Tradition”, in: Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 13, Issue 3.
Hellmann, Gunther/Stark Urrestarazu, Ursula (2013): “Theories of Foreign Policy”, in: David Armstrong (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stark Urrestarazu, Ursula (2010): Us and Them. Culture, identity and foreign policy (Forschungsberichte international Politik, vol. 41), Münster: LIT-Verlag.
Vec, Miloš (2010): “Intervention/ Nichtintervention. Verrechtlichung der Politik und Politisierung des Völkerrechts im 19. Jahrhundert”, in: Ullrich Lappenküper, Rainer Marcowicz (eds.): Power and law. International law in international relations Paderborn: Schöningh, 135-160.

The project included a workshop “The Emergence and Transformation of Foreign Policy” with Iver Neumann and Johannes Paulmann, December 16, 2010, Goethe University Frankfurt and two international conferences on “The Emergence and Transformation of Foreign Policy” in Bologna, June 10-12, 2011, Johns Hopkins University SAIS Bologna Center and May 25-27, 2012 at the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt am Main.

News from the research center

Event
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Panel Discussion, Lecture

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

more information ›
Event
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Panel Discussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

more information ›
Event
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Colloquium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

more information ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanist politics and the decline of reason in liberal democracies

For the last time in the winter semester 2025/26, the Research Center hosted the lecture series "Am Scheidepunkt. On the crisis of democracy". At the end, philosopher Michael Rosen from Harvard University presented his concept of "satanic politics" as a variant of the political interpretation of the world.

more information ›
News
09.02.2026

On the topicality of the concept of violence based on Camus and Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt from the University of St. Gallen gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence as part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", she gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence. Under the title "Defending democracies. On the topicality of the concept of violence in Camus and Derrida", the philosopher discussed forms of violence and revolt and categorized them with regard to a democratic setting.

more information ›
Publication
04.02.2026 | Journal article

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027.

more information ›
News
02.02.2026

States competing for people - David Owen on civil geopolitics

As part of the lecture series "At the Crossroads - The Future of Democracy", David Owen from the University of Southampton presented his concept of civil geopolitics.

more information ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel on reorientation in catastrophic times

As part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", the sociologist spoke about living in and dealing with catastrophic times. Against the backdrop of the destruction of living conditions, wars, permanent crises and threats to democracy, Hentschel addressed the infiltration of the catastrophic into everyday social life and a changing activist and literary approach to the future.

more information ›
Publication
08.01.2026 | Journal article

Gender Differences in Financial Advice

Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Hackethal, Andreas; Koenen, Johannes; Laudenbach, Christine (2025): „Gender Differences in Financial Advice“. In: American Economic Review, 115 (12), pp. 4218–4252.

more information ›