The limits of helping under conditions of multiple crises

The aim is to explore the symbolic boundaries of helping. These are determined on three levels: At the micro level, in the everyday interaction of practices of helping and their justifications; at the meso level, in the way individual practices of helping are interlinked with state agencies – especially local government; and at the macro level, in the way discourses of helping mediated by the mass media are reflected in the symbolic demarcations of actors from different social milieus. These objectives will be addressed in three sub-projects – corresponding to these levels – based on the analysis of individual and expert interviews, group discussions and media discourses. Firstly, the way in which volunteers and refugees in rural areas reflect on and evaluate their practices of helping and the relationships that have emerged from them will be examined. Many of these helping relationships have existed since 2015 and are characterized by a surprising durability. Other helping relationships have emerged since the arrival of Ukrainian women in 2022. The sub-project focuses on how the actors involved engage with this everyday aid and the boundaries they mark in their practices. Secondly, it examines the way in which local authorities and volunteers interact in supporting refugees. The sub-project will answer the questions of where local authorities mark the boundaries of voluntary help and insist on state responsibilities, where they replace their own responsibilities with voluntary work and how conflicts between volunteers and municipal employees are handled and resolved. Thirdly, it examines the way in which justifications of helping and its limits are discursively produced and how these are conveyed to ordinary actors from different contexts and milieus. Under the conditions of the high frequency of global crises in recent years, it can be assumed that actors are increasingly grappling with their own dependency and vulnerability. The aim of the sub-project is to reconstruct the (exclusive) solidarities that emerge under these conditions and to examine the way in which they are reflected in justifications of helping and their limits in different social milieus. The research findings, which will also be made available to the wider public via events, podcasts and publications, are intended to promote public debate about the limits of helping and their justifications. In concrete terms, both volunteers who are involved in helping others and public administrations that coordinate their measures with volunteers can benefit from the research group’s findings.

Responsible for the project: Prof. Dr. Greta Wagner

The project is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)

News from the research center

News
30.06.2025

Article "Ideology and Suffering: What Is Realistic about Critical Theory?" by Amadeus Ulrich published in EJPT

The article "Ideology and Suffering: What Is Realistic about Critical Theory?" by Amadeus Ulrich has just been published open access in the European Journal of Political Theory (EJPT). Ulrich brings the perspective of radical realism into a productive dialog with Adorno's critical theory.

more information ›
News
30.06.2025

Prof. Dr. Franziska Fay awarded the Sibylle Kalkhof-Rose University Prize 2025

Prof. Dr. Franziska Fay (Junior Professor of Ethnology with a focus on Political Anthropology at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) and former postdoctoral researcher at the Research Center Normative Orders at Goethe University) receives the Sibylle Kalkhof-Rose University Award 2025 in the category Humanities and Social Sciences.

more information ›
Publication
25.06.2025 | Online article

Ideology and Suffering: What Is Realistic about Critical Theory?

Ulrich, Amadeus (2025): Ideology and suffering: What is realistic about critical theory? European Journal of Political Theory, 0(0).  https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851251351782

more information ›
News
24.06.2025

New series “Vertrauensfragen” in the Frankfurter Rundschau initiated by Hendrik Simon

Democracy thrives on debate - if it serves the joint search for solutions. There is often a problem with this cooperation. The new FR series “Vertrauensfragen”, initiated by Hendrik Simon (Research Institute Social Cohesion (RISC) Frankfurt location at Goethe University's Research Centre Normative Orders ), examines why this is the case and how we can do better.

more information ›
Publication
23.06.2025 | Working Paper

Untrustworthy Authorities and Complicit Bankers: Unraveling Monetary Distrust in Argentina

Moreno, Guadalupe (2025): “Untrustworthy Authorities and Complicit Bankers: Unraveling Monetary Distrust in Argentina”. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Discussion Paper 25/3.

more information ›
News
22.05.2025

Does deliberative democracy have a future in the age of oligarchs, autocrats and patriarchs?

On June 3, Prof. Simone Chambers will give a lecture on the value of democracies and the future of the form of government.

more information ›
Publication
19.05.2025 | Anthology

Klimaethik. Ein Reader

Sparenborg, Lukas; Moellendorf, Darrel (Hrsg.) (2025) : Klimaethik. Ein Reader. Suhrkamp.

more information ›
News
19.05.2025

What can a baroque tapestry tell us about colonial iconography?

Lecture by Cécile Fromone on May 21. The professor at the Department of the History of Art and Architecture at Harvard University, director of the Cooper Gallery at the Hutchins Center and author will talk about the long-forgotten African origins of iconography and its colonial dimension.

more information ›
News
05.05.2025

Normative Orders Newsletter 01/25 published

The newsletter from Research Centre Normative Orders collects information on current events, reports, news and publications several times a year. Read the first issue 2025 here.

more information ›