17.12.2024

A radical approach to popular sovereignty

An obituary for Prof. Dr. Ingeborg Maus (1937-2024)

With the death of Ingeborg Maus, who passed away on December 14 at the age of 87, Goethe University and the community of researchers have lost one of the most important political theorists of our time. Her thinking left a lasting mark on Frankfurt and national political science and jurisprudence in a special way – through the most radical interpretation of the principle of popular sovereignty that is compatible with the structures of the modern state.

Ingeborg Maus, born in Wiesbaden in 1937, studied political science, German and philosophy in Frankfurt and Berlin. Her doctorate in Frankfurt in 1971, supervised by Carlo Schmid and Christian Graf von Krockow, already dealt with her life’s theme: the constitutional power of all citizens and how it could be translated into positive, democratic law – in contrast to theories of law and the state that ranged from Carl Schmitt to contemporary legal thinking. For Maus, the general form of law was to be strictly preserved in order to enable the freedom and equality of all and to defend it against the self-authorization of executives and the legal overarching of popular sovereignty. Her book Bürgerliche Rechtstheorie und Faschismus (Civil Legal Theory and Fascism) from 1976 set this out, as did her later book on legal theory and political theory in late capitalism (1986).

After working as a research assistant and completing her habilitation in Frankfurt in 1980, she taught at Goethe University and at various universities in Germany and Japan before becoming a member of the working group on legal theory founded by Jürgen Habermas with funding from the Leibniz Prize. There, the author of these lines was able to experience the commitment with which Ingeborg Maus adhered to the basic principles of the modern democratic constitutional state. Rousseau and Kant in particular provided the philosophical foundations for her thinking, which was able to move elegantly between the history of ideas, philosophy and current democratic and legal theory. All of this flowed into her main work, Zur Aufklärung der Demokratietheorie, which appeared in 1992 and may be considered unrivalled in the consistency with which she interprets Kant’s political philosophy in a radically democratic way and pursues the captivating idea that the democratic self-legislation of the people follows the same structural logic of strict universalization as the categorical imperative in Kant’s moral philosophy. In this way, practical reason becomes a political-legal, institutional reality.

“Über Volkssouveränität” was published by Suhrkamp in 2011.

In 1992, Ingeborg Maus was appointed Professor of Political Theory and History of Ideas, succeeding Iring Fetscher, and developed an extensive teaching career that was driven by a positive enthusiasm for the principles of democracy understood in the right way as well as by criticism of the “refeudalization” of law and politics in de-formalized and legally over-regulated systems of rule.

After her retirement in 2003, she published a series of important works in which she elaborated on her concept of popular sovereignty, human rights and peace policy as well as her criticism of the judiciary as a “social superego”. These positions round off the picture of a comprehensive, stringently developed political theory based on clear basic ideas, which can be regarded as the purest form of the modern concept of democratic citizenship.

Ingeborg Maus will be remembered as both a great theorist and the wonderful person she was.

News from the research center

Event
18.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Das Prinzip Donald Trump und die Verrohung der Welt

Panel Discussion, Lecture

Ein neuer Politikstil macht international Karriere. Er ist gekennzeichnet von Vulgarität, Verrohung und erklärter Rechtsfeindschaft. Machtinteressen werden nicht mehr juristisch bemäntelt. Stattdessen wird das angebliche Recht des Stärkeren zur Staatsdoktrin gemacht – innenpolitisch wie außenpolitisch. Treibende Kraft hinter dieser Verrohung der politischen Sitten ist ein US-Präsident, der nicht nur die amerikanische Gesellschaft und Kultur, sondern auch die globale Ordnung nach seinen Vorstellungen und Interessen umgestaltet. Die Römerberggespräche wollen diesen Politikstil verstehen.

more information ›
Event
29.04.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

Kulturindustrie heute?

Panel Discussion

Das Gespräch „Kulturindustrie heute?“ widmet sich der Aktualität und Tragfähigkeit eines zentralen Begriffs der Kritischen Theorie. Die Filmwissenschaftlerin Gertrud Koch diskutiert im Rahmen der Gesprächsreihe "Frankfurter Schule" mit dem Filmkritiker Bert Rebhandl die gegenwärtigen Formen kultureller Produktion und Verbreitung vor dem Hintergrund von Digitalisierung, Plattformen und globalen Medienmärkten.

more information ›
Event
20.03.2026 | Frankfurt am Main

40 Jahre Schengen-Raum

Colloquium

Der 1984 geschlossene Schengen-Vertrag schuf einen heute 29 Staaten umfassenden Raum ohne Binnengrenzen, doch Migration über die Außengrenzen führte zuletzt zur Wiedereinführung von Kontrollen, auch durch die Bundesregierung ab 8. Mai 2025. Das Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium diskutiert die rechtliche Zulässigkeit, wirtschaftliche Folgen insbesondere für Arbeitsmigration und Arbeitsmarkt sowie die Zukunft des Schengen-Raums.

more information ›
News
12.02.2026

Satanist politics and the decline of reason in liberal democracies

For the last time in the winter semester 2025/26, the Research Center hosted the lecture series "Am Scheidepunkt. On the crisis of democracy". At the end, philosopher Michael Rosen from Harvard University presented his concept of "satanic politics" as a variant of the political interpretation of the world.

more information ›
News
09.02.2026

On the topicality of the concept of violence based on Camus and Derrida

Prof. Dr. Christine Abbt from the University of St. Gallen gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence as part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", she gave a lecture on democracies and the concept of violence. Under the title "Defending democracies. On the topicality of the concept of violence in Camus and Derrida", the philosopher discussed forms of violence and revolt and categorized them with regard to a democratic setting.

more information ›
Publication
04.02.2026 | Journal article

New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts

Wille, Tobias; Simon, Hendrik; Daase, Christopher; Deitelhoff, Nicole; Wheeler, Nicholas J.; Holmes, Marcus; Rathbun, Brian C.; Acharya, Amitav; Mitzen, Jennifer (2026): „New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts“. In: International Studies Review 28 (1), viaf027.

more information ›
News
02.02.2026

States competing for people - David Owen on civil geopolitics

As part of the lecture series "At the Crossroads - The Future of Democracy", David Owen from the University of Southampton presented his concept of civil geopolitics.

more information ›
News
20.01.2026

Christine Hentschel on reorientation in catastrophic times

As part of the lecture series "At the crossroads? On the crisis of democracy", the sociologist spoke about living in and dealing with catastrophic times. Against the backdrop of the destruction of living conditions, wars, permanent crises and threats to democracy, Hentschel addressed the infiltration of the catastrophic into everyday social life and a changing activist and literary approach to the future.

more information ›
Publication
08.01.2026 | Journal article

Gender Differences in Financial Advice

Bucher-Koenen, Tabea; Hackethal, Andreas; Koenen, Johannes; Laudenbach, Christine (2025): „Gender Differences in Financial Advice“. In: American Economic Review, 115 (12), pp. 4218–4252.

more information ›