Former Fellow

Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez

Magistrada / Federal Judge at the Colombian Federal Administrative Court (Consejo de Estado, Colombia)

Research project:
The peace process and the democratic system in Colombia: The role of electoral justice in the post-conflict period

Abstract
The signing of the final agreement to end the conflict and build a stable and lasting peace between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrillas led to a change in the framework in which social conflicts develop in the country.
Democracy replaces the battlefields where armed violence prevailed in the past, re-establishing institutional channels to channel protests and social demands as a sine qua non for maintaining peaceful coexistence within any society.

This is no small achievement, as it puts an end to an armed conflict that not only lasted more than half a century, but also claimed more than 8,376,843 victims, all of whom are now demanding truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition. Thus, one of the cruelest phases of Colombian violence, that characteristic feature of republican history, but which has its origins in the arrival of the Spanish “conquistadors” in the territory in 1499, comes to an end.
The construction and consolidation of peace in Colombia is thus achieved by strengthening the democratic system as a substitute sphere for the violent conflict; the goal of “democratic opening to build peace” (as the second aspect of the Havana Agreement) promotes not only the quantitative expansion, but the fundamental qualification (deepening) of this democratic opening beyond elections, recognizing the quality of those who were outside the civil society sphere in the past as political subjects.

These two approaches – expansion and qualification – of the democratic principle are realized with the signing of the Peace Pact, on the one hand, by strengthening affirmative measures with a gender focus that lead to a certain political equality of the sexes and, on the other hand, by creating a normative framework that changes the status quo of the electoral regime by, among other things, reducing the costs of establishing political parties and movements, promoting the emergence of new electoral authorities and regulating the exercise of political opposition.

These changes to the Colombian electoral regime pose new challenges for the electoral jurisdiction, whose task in this new scenario will be to protect the “bulwark” of the agreement – namely the democratic principle. On the one hand, it must guarantee compliance with the commitments to a gender-equal democracy, and on the other, it must adapt to the new legal framework.

Democracy becomes the epicenter for the construction of a stable and lasting peace, and the role of the electoral judge must be precisely to maintain the minimum conditions for its implementation, so that in this peaceful context social demands can develop that have used war as a means of protest in the past. The function of the electoral jurisdiction is thus primarily to maintain the conditions for the exercise of democracy, as a basis for the development of a culture of political debate, as is characteristic of the transitional regime that established the signing of the agreement.

The electoral judge is the guarantor of the demands arising from the signing of the Havana Agreement and affecting the country’s democratic system, so that his jurisdiction will undoubtedly go beyond the judicial sphere and influence the political dynamic – its exercise and consolidation.

However, the preservation of democracy is not an exclusive task of this specialized jurisdiction, but rather extends to various judicial bodies in Colombia, in particular the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, which was created by the Havana Pact. Its task is to investigate and try crimes committed during the armed civil war, whereby a conviction does not exclude or restrict the political participation of those convicted.

The construction of the agreement is thus understood as the key to democracy – as a basic value framework to be upheld by the electoral judges, but equally by the emerging jurisdiction responsible for the transitional instruments.

Events:
Thursday, November 8, 2018, 6 p.m.
Public lecture: Dhe peace process and the democratic system in Colombia: The role of electoral justice in the post-conflict period

Friday, November 9, 2018, 1:45 p.m.
Lecture in the seminar “Contemporary Political Thought” at the American University of Paris
The Peace Process and Democratic System in Colombia: The Role of Electoral Jurisdiction in Post-Conflict Situations

Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 2 p.m.
Lecture at the Ibero-American Colloquium at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law
The peace process in Colombia. Progress and challenges from the perspective of the Council of State

  • Biografische Angaben

    Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez studied law at the Universidad La Gran Colombia (Bogotá) and specialized in criminal law and criminology at the Universidad Santo Tomás (Bogotá). Since 2013, she has been a federal judge in Colombia (Consejo de Estado), where she has presided over important trials such as the nullity action against the results of the referendum for peace in Colombia and currently the nullity action against the 2018-2022 elections to the Senate of the Republic. Before becoming a federal judge, she held various positions as a public prosecutor. She was also Vice President of the National Commission for Control and Electoral Matters of the Attorney General's Office and a judge at the National Electoral Council and the Council of State. She has taught at various universities such as the Universidad Libre de Colombia, the Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario and the Universidad Sergio Arboleda. She has also acted as a consultant on issues of electoral law, contractual and non-contractual liability of the state, disciplinary law and property liability of public officials. Lucy Jeannette Bermúdez Bermúdez is the author of numerous articles and research papers on various topics, including public defense, arbitration, electoral crimes, the electoral process and electoral control.
  • Publikationen

    /

News from the research center

Event
19.11.2025 | Frankfurt am Main

Unerwünscht. Die westdeutsche Demokratie und die Verfolgten des NS-Regimes

Book Presentation

Der Vortrag von Prof. Dr. Stefanie Schüler-Springorum schildert die Erfahrungen von überlebenden Juden und Sinti und Roma, von ehemaligen Zwangsarbeitern und Homosexuellen in Westdeutschland in der Nachkriegszeit.

more information ›
News
04.09.2025

Rainer Forst awarded the Goethe Plakette of the City of Frankfurt am Main

On September 4, 2025, the political philosopher and Director of the Research Centre Normative Orders Prof. Dr. Rainer Forst was awarded the Goethe Plakette of the City of Frankfurt am Main. With this award, the city honors personalities who have set standards far beyond Frankfurt's borders through their academic work and/or their public impact.

more information ›
Event
15.10.2025 | Frankfurt am Main

Aufrecht. Überleben im Zeitalter der Extreme

Book Presentation

ACHTUNG RAUMÄNDERUNG! In ihrem jüngsten Werk begibt sich Lea Ypi auf eine Reise in die Vergangenheit ihrer Familie und verknüpft persönliche Erinnerungen mit den großen politischen und gesellschaftlichen Umbrüchen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Das Forschungszentrum Normative Ordnungen lädt gemeinsam mit dem Netzwerk FrauenmitFormat, dem Honorarkonsulat der Republik Albanien in Frankfurt am Main und dem Suhrkamp Verlag herzlich zur Vorstellung des neuen Buches von Prof. Dr. Lea Ypi mit anschließender Diskussionsrunde mit Prof. Dr. Lea Ypi, Honorarkonsulin Dr. Jonela Hoxhaj und Prof. Dr. Rainer Forst unter der Moderation von Rebecca C. Schmidt ein.

more information ›
Publication
02.09.2025 | Journal article

Beyond Myth Busting: How Engagement with Ethical Dilemmas Can Improve Debates and Policymaking on Migration

Schmid, Lukas; Ruhs, Martin; Bauböck, Rainer; Mourão Permoser, Julia (2025): "Beyond Myth Busting: How Engagement with Ethical Dilemmas Can Improve Debates and Policymaking on Migration". In: Ethics & International Affairs, 39 (1), S. 26-36.

more information ›
Publication
01.09.2025 | Journal article

Roundtable: Ethical Dilemmas and Migration Policymaking

Schmid, Lukas; Ruhs, Martin; Bauböck Rainer, Mourão Permoser, Julia (Hrsg.) (2025): "Roundtable: Ethical Dilemmas and Migration Policymaking". In: Ethics & International Affairs, 39 (1)

more information ›
Publication
21.08.2025 | Anthology

Autoritäre Treiber eines Systemwechsels. Zur Destabilisierung von Institutionen durch die AfD

Frankenberg, Günter; Heitmeyer, Wilhelm (Hrsg.) (2025): Autoritäre Treiber eines Systemwechsels. Zur Destabilisierung von Institutionen durch die AfD. Campus Verlag.

more information ›
News
31.07.2025

Shaping the future - a review

As part of the exhibition "Fixing Futures. Planetary futures between speculation and control", our four-part lecture series "Shaping the future - between climate change, technology and social responsibility" took place.

more information ›
News
30.07.2025

What remains of "1968" - event review

What can we learn from the 1968 movement for our own time and where do we perhaps need new ideas and utopias? The event "Utopia and awakening of the 1968ers - What remains of political rebellion and individual self-liberation" on July 14, 2025 at the Historisches Museum was dedicated to these questions

more information ›
News
10.07.2025

Impressions from the Crisis Talk "Europe in a multipolar world"

The Crisis Talk "Europe in a multipolar world - How can the EU meet the challenges of major powers?" held on July 1, 2025 at the Representation of the State of Hesse to the European Union was dedicated to the question of how the EU should shape its influence and assume its responsibilities in this international environment.

more information ›