{"id":8941,"date":"2023-04-08T17:52:00","date_gmt":"2023-04-08T15:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reverent-antonelli.23-88-7-78.plesk.page\/publikation\/knowledge-and-trust-what-we-can-learn-from-the-debates-about-epistemic-injustice\/"},"modified":"2025-05-08T23:13:18","modified_gmt":"2025-05-08T21:13:18","slug":"knowledge-and-trust-what-we-can-learn-from-the-debates-about-epistemic-injustice","status":"publish","type":"publikation","link":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/publikation\/knowledge-and-trust-what-we-can-learn-from-the-debates-about-epistemic-injustice\/","title":{"rendered":"Knowledge and Trust-What We Can Learn from the Debates About Epistemic Injustice"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>My aim in this paper is to make the debates about epistemic injustice fruitful for an analysis of trust in the knowledge of others. Epistemic trust is understood here in a broad sense: not only as trust in scientific knowledge or expert knowledge, but also as trust in implicit, positioned and experience-based knowledge. Using insights from discussions of epistemic injustice, I argue for three interrelated theses:  <\/p>\n\n<p>1. questions of epistemic trust and trustworthiness cannot be answered with reference to individual virtue alone; rather, they have a structural component.<\/p>\n\n<p>2. the rationality of epistemic trust must be analyzed against the background of social structures and social relations of domination.<\/p>\n\n<p>3. epistemic trust is (also) a political phenomenon and epistemically just relations depend on political transformation processes that promote equality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Schidel, Regina (2023): &#8220;Knowledge and Trust-What We Can Learn from the Debates About Epistemic Injustice&#8221;. ConTrust Working Paper Series, No. 7. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":8934,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"publikation_cat":[287],"disciplines":[171],"series":[368],"class_list":["post-8941","publikation","type-publikation","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","publikation_cat-working-paper","disciplines-philosophy","series-contrust-working-paper-series-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation\/8941"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikation"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8934"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publikation_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation_cat?post=8941"},{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=8941"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=8941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}