{"id":13500,"date":"2025-12-16T11:49:47","date_gmt":"2025-12-16T10:49:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/?post_type=publikation&#038;p=13500"},"modified":"2026-07-24T11:52:42","modified_gmt":"2026-07-24T09:52:42","slug":"kant-on-moral-universality-and-the-normative-foundations-of-right","status":"publish","type":"publikation","link":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/publikation\/kant-on-moral-universality-and-the-normative-foundations-of-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Kant on Moral Universality and the Normative Foundations of Right"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This chapter discusses the relation between \u2018Morals\u2019 (<em>Sitten<\/em>,\u00a0<em>Moral<\/em>) and \u2018Right\u2019 (<em>Recht<\/em>) in Kant\u2019s\u00a0<em>Metaphysics of Morals<\/em>. Two questions should be distinguished: (1) Are Kantian Morals necessary for Kantian Right in the sense that the latter presupposes Kant\u2019s specific account of morality? (2) Is Kant\u2019s account of Morals sufficient to justify his conception of Right, in the sense that the fundamental principles of Right can be derived from, or normatively justified by, the Categorical Imperative (or some other element of Kantian Morals) without additional normative principles? With respect to the first question, it is argued that Kantian Right presupposes a central aspect of Kantian Morals: the idea of moral universality, where moral rights and duties are the same for all. This idea must be distinguished from the Categorical Imperative introduced in the\u00a0<em>Groundwork for a Metaphysics of Morals<\/em>. Concerning the second question, it is argued that only when applied to individual juridical (coercible) rights does the idea of moral universality result in a Kantian conception of Right. Thus, Kant\u2019s conception of Morals alone is not sufficient to derive juridical rights and duties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Willaschek, Marcus (2025): \u201eKant on Moral Universality and the Normative Foundations of Right\u201c. In: Brecher, Martin; Hirsch, Philipp-Alexander (Hrsg.): Law and Morality in Kant, Cambridge University Press, S. 17-35.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":13501,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"publikation_cat":[98],"disciplines":[71],"series":[],"class_list":["post-13500","publikation","type-publikation","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","publikation_cat-zeitschriftenartikel","disciplines-philosophie"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation\/13500"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikation"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publikation_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation_cat?post=13500"},{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=13500"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=13500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}