{"id":11419,"date":"2025-08-22T14:46:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-22T12:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/publikation\/zur-erosion-der-autoritaet-des-lissabon-urteils-des-bundesverfassungsgerichts-the-erosion-of-the-german-lisbon-judgments-authority\/"},"modified":"2025-10-09T18:07:29","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T16:07:29","slug":"zur-erosion-der-autoritaet-des-lissabon-urteils-des-bundesverfassungsgerichts-the-erosion-of-the-german-lisbon-judgments-authority","status":"publish","type":"publikation","link":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/publikation\/zur-erosion-der-autoritaet-des-lissabon-urteils-des-bundesverfassungsgerichts-the-erosion-of-the-german-lisbon-judgments-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"Zur Erosion der Autorit\u00e4t des Lissabon-Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts The Erosion of the German Lisbon Judgment&#8217;s Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This paper revisits the German Constitutional Court\u2019s Lisbon judgment (2009) and its restrictive stance towards European integration. It argues that the judgment\u2019s reasoning was problematic from the outset and has become increasingly untenable in view of today\u2019s geopolitical and domestic challenges. In light of these subsequent political and legal developments the judgment\u2019s authority has significantly eroded. In practice, German policy has already moved beyond the rigid constraints suggested by the Lisbon Court, with major integration steps advancing into areas the judgment had sought to block. The article therefore calls for a recalibration of the Court\u2019s restrictive jurisprudence, building on the more integration-friendly line developed by its First Senate, and thus situating German constitutional law more constructively within the European constitutional order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bogdandy, Armin von (2025): \u201eZur Erosion der Autorit\u00e4t des Lissabon-Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts The Erosion of the German Lisbon Judgment&#8217;s Authority\u201c. In: Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law &#038; International Law Research Paper, 2025 (16).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":11307,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"publikation_cat":[287],"disciplines":[175],"series":[],"class_list":["post-11419","publikation","type-publikation","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","publikation_cat-working-paper","disciplines-rechtswissenschaften-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation\/11419"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikation"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publikation_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikation_cat?post=11419"},{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=11419"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/normativeorders.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=11419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}